Eight years later, this promise has yet to be fulfilled, and even with the help of many countries globally, the threat of terrorism is still evident more then ever, which questions whether the global war on terror is succeeding.
The arguments presented are significant, but what cannot be ignored is the conclusive evidence which reveals that terrorist attacks have been on the increase for the past several years. Second, international support for the global war on terrorism is decreasing.
Although the invasion was intended to disarm Iraq from any weapons of mass destruction, it was also aimed at uncovering and eliminating any terrorist organizations within the country since several United States officials accused Hussein of harboring and supporting al-Qaeda, the terrorist organization responsible for the September 11 attacks.
Conclusion The War on Terror has made the people world feel as is they are in a dangerous place, especially those of Islamic faith, and has created a counter-terrorism oriented foreign policy.
Issues of prisoner abuse arose, which were then made public throughout the world and left a stain on the United States effort to fight terrorism.
Moreover, less than half of the United Kingdom and Germany supported the war, only forty-three percent of France were in favor and a very low twenty-six percent of Japanese people supported the war.
S-led war on terrorism was to control the oil within the Middle East and to dominate the world. Invading Iraq may have deterred it from becoming a threat to the American people and the people of the world at the time, but overtime what has been evident is the increase in religious extremist and terrorist activity within Iraq and surrounding areas.
The logistics and man power it takes to combat terrorism is immense, and it seems more evident that the global war on terrorism is not succeeding due to essentially three factors.
This was a reply to a statement Bush made to a graduating class from West Point Military Academy. Main ne Allah Ko apney iraadon ke totney se pehchana hay!! Others claim this is just common hatred, others would tell you to look at the number of anti-Jewish hate crimes ina number that exceeds one thousand FBI.
The images and stories coming out of Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq revealed that prisoners were abused, tortured and humiliated by American soldiers. However, some argue that the occupation of Iraq was essential in the global fight against terrorism.
However, it may be argued that the global war on terrorism is succeeding since it is preventing potentially large terrorist attacks from occurring and since statistics generally represent the war as unsuccessful. In his address to the nation, George W.
An additional underlying factor that can be contributing to this decrease of support for the United States may be the misunderstanding and misinterpretation between countries on the definition of terrorism.
When a large amount of nations across the world united and supported each other in the global war on terrorism, their intentions were to decrease the amount of terrorism in the world and to make their own countries more safe and secure for their citizens.
Bush had announced the global war on terrorism, the number of international terrorist attacks had consistently increased. These arguments are relevant when one looks at the reasons for the decrease in support for the U. There was also the question whether the United States invasion of Iraq was justified and acceptable under international law.
Nevertheless, some may not disagree that there is decreasing support for the U. Moreover, to entirely grasp the subject, one must be familiar with the definition of terrorism and it can be defined as an act of violence or threatened violence intended to spread panic in a society, and to bring about political change.
In conclusion, the global war on terrorism led by the United States has been ultimately unsuccessful. They also claimed that, far from the original goals, the war has made people more fearful, as well as deepening divisions between people of different faiths and origins.
Countries are essentially more concerned about their own security than whether or not a certain state is following international laws or not.
Erosion of Public Freedom The freedom of American citizens is being slowly eroded.Environment Essay: Is the War on Terrorism also a War on the Environment?
- As the U.S. prepares to respond to the ghastly terrorist attacks of September 11, the hard task will be to choose among effective options while minimizing the costs.
Since the goal of the global war on terrorism was to decrease terrorist attacks, the war cannot be seen as a successful one. In conclusion, the global war on terrorism led by the United States has been ultimately unsuccessful. Dangers of the War on Terrorism - Dangers of the War on Terrorism The President of the United State has used the phrases “War on Poverty”, “War on Drugs”, War on Illiteracy”, and the “War on Hunger,” when describing the problems Americans are facing.
Essay on Dangers of the War on Terrorism Words | 12 Pages the War on Terrorism The President of the United State has used the phrases “War on Poverty”, “War on Drugs”, War on Illiteracy”, and the “War on Hunger,” when describing the problems Americans are facing.
Sep 08, · Introduction The War on Terror was started by the events of September 11th, and july 7th, Since then the foreign policy of the US and UK has. This indicates the inner reason of terrorism, decreeing from the point of its viewpoints, mindset, method of approach and the consequences as studied by Keet ().
In addition to the dehumanization of terrorists, Keet () claimed that religion is essential cause for the terrorism as it stressed on the Muslim extremists in the Middle East.Download