Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Random websites with no qualifications are references. Topic focus The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment.
The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books.
The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources.
The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Sources More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books.
The topic is not clearly defined. Good The author provides concluding remarks that show an analysis and synthesis of ideas occurred. The paper does not demonstrate that the author has fully understood and applied concepts learned in the course.
For the most part, ties together information from all sources. Does not tie together information. Paper does not flow - disjointedness is apparent. Cites some data obtained from other sources.
All web sites utilized are credible. Excellent References are primarily peer-reviewed professional journals or other approved sources.Rubric for Grades on Literature Papers A (+/-) Mechanics: A papers exhibit no significant (but perhaps one or two minor) syntactical, grammatical, punctuation or format (i.e., citation) errors.
Analysis: A papers exhibit a sustained, consistent level of analysis appropriate to the linguistic, rhetorical and thematic aspects of the work; they employ. Consequently, use this rubric as a guide when writing your essay and check it again before you submit your essay.
Traits 4 3 2 1 Focus & Details There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear and are well supported by paper. Information is relevant and presented in a logical order. The conclusion is strong. The introduction.
iRubric HX76B A literature review rubric for graduate level capstone course. Free rubric builder and assessment tools. Literature Review Rubric.
Research question(s) are formed through the literature review. Research question(s) were not formed but could be formed through review. Research question(s) were not formed and are not apparent from the literature review. The Proseminar presenters will not use the rubric to evaluate your paper.
The. Research question(s) are formed through the literature review. Research question(s) were not formed but could be formed through the literature review. Research question(s) were not formed and are not apparent from the literature review. Literature Review Rubric. Literature Review, Analytic Scoring Rubric.
writing technique It is hard to know what the writer is trying to express. Misspelled words, incorrect grammar, and improper punctuation make reading Education Assessment .Download